Home Programme Tickets Office About the festival Venues Sponsors Archives Download News Gallery

Krzysztof Penderecki

next
go back
all events
fringe events

index of composers
index of performers

Born in 1933 in D´bica. His first teacher of composition was Franciszek Sko1yszewski. In 1954 he was admitted to the State Higher School of Music in Kraków where he studied composition with Artur Malawski and, on Malawski1s death, with Stanis1aw Wiechowicz. In 1960 he captured the attention of Western critics with Anaklasis, performed at the Donaueschingen Festival under the direction of Hans Rosbaud. Penderecki1s international position was consolidated in the 1960s, thanks to such pieces as Dimensions of Time and Silence, Threnody to the Victims of Hiroshima, Polymorphia, Fluorescences, String Quartet No. 1, Dies irae and Stabat Mater. The St Luke Passion brought Penderecki the Great Arts Award of the Land of North Rhine-Westphalia (1966) and the Prix Italia in 1967. In the same year, he was also awarded the Sibelius Gold Medal.
Towards the end of the 1960s he began work on the opera The Devils of Loudun. After its premiere at the Hamburg Staatsoper in 1969, it was successfully performed at theatres throughout the world, as were the composer1s three successive operas: Paradise Lost (premiered in Chicago, 1978), Die Schwarze Maske (premiered at the Salzburg Festival, 1986) and Ubu Rex (premiered at the Bayerische Staatsoper in Munich, 1991).
In 1996 the performance of The Seven Gates of Jerusalem, commissioned by the city of Jerusalem, was one of the highlights of the celebrations of the city1s 3000th anniversary.
>From 1973 to 1978 Penderecki lectured at Yale University in New Haven. He served as Rector of the Music Academy in Cracow (1982­87). Since 1973 he has also developed a career as a conductor. Penderecki1s long list of honours includes the Herder Prize (1977), the Sibelius Prize (1983), the Premio Lorenzo Magnifico (1985), the Award of the Karl Wolff Foundation in Israel (1987), the Grand Cross of the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany (1990), the title of Chevalier de Saint Georges (1990), the Grawemeyer Award from the
University of Louisville (1992), the Commander1s Cross with Star of Polonia Restituta (1993), the Austrian honorary distinction for achievements in science and arts (1994) the unesco International Music Council Award (1994). In 1998 he was honoured with the Composition Award of the Association for the Promotion of European Industry and Trade, in 2000 he received the Cannes Classical Award as OThe Best Living Composer of the Year1. In 2002 he was honoured by the Bavarian Catholic Academy with the R. Guardini Award (its former recipients include Carl Orff and Richard Weizsaecker).
Penderecki has received honorary doctorates from numerous universities, including those in Belgrade, Bordeaux, Glasgow, Leuven, Madrid, Pittsburgh, PoznaY, Rochester, Warsaw, Washington (Georgetown University), as well as the Tchaikovsky Conservatory in Moscow and the St. Olaf College in Northfield (Minnesota). He is an honorary member of the Royal Academy of Music in London, the Accademia Nazionale di Santa Cecilia in Rome, the Kungliga Musikaliska Akademien in Stockholm, and the Akademie der Künste in Berlin.
He is also Honorary Professor of the Conservatory in Beijing.
Penderecki1s book, The Labyrinth of Time. Five Addresses for the End of the Millennium, was published in Polish (Warsaw, OPresspublica1, 1997) and in English (Chapel Hill, 1998).

Selected works (since 1979): Symphony No. 2 OChristmas1 (1979­80), Te Deum for solo voices, two choirs and orchestra (1979­80), Concerto per violoncello ed orchestra No. 2 (1982), Concerto per viola ed orchestra (1983), Polish Requiem for solo voices, choir and orchestra (1980­84, new version 1993), Die Schwarze Maske, opera after Gerhart Hauptmann (1984­86), Per Slava for solo cello (1985­86), Izhe cheruvimi / Song of Cherubims for a cappella choir (1987), Symphony No. 3 (1988­95), Passacaglia for orchestra (1988), Der unterbrochene Gedanke for string quartet (1988), Adagio. Symphony No. 4 (1989), Ubu Rex, opera buffa after Alfred Jarry (1990­91), String Trio (1990­91), Sinfonietta per archi (1992), Symphony No. 5 (1992), Concerto per flauto ed orchestra da camera (1992), Metamorphosen. Violin Concerto No. 2 (1992­95), Quartet for Clarinet and String Trio (1993), Sinfonietta no. 2 per clarinetto ed archi (1994), Entrata for brass instruments and timpani (1994), Divertimento per violoncello solo (1994), Concerto per violino ed orchestra No. 2 (1992­95), Concerto per clarinetto ed orchestra da camera (1992­95), Seven Gates of Jerusalem for soloists, reciter, three mixed choirs and orchestra (1996), Serenade for String Orchestra (1996­97), Hymne an den heiligen Daniel OSlava svjatamu dlinnju knazju moskovskamu1 for choir and wind instruments (1997), Credo for soloists, children1s choir, mixed choir and symphony orchestra (1998), Musik für Blockflöten, Marimbaphon und Streicher (2000), Sextet for Violin, Viola, Cello, Clarinet, Horn and Piano (2000), Concerto grosso for three cellos and orchestra (2000­01), Piano Concerto OResurrection1 (2001­02).

String Quartet No. 1
The piece was written shortly after Threnody for the Victims of Hiroshima, at a time when Penderecki was aggressively exploring the musical use of unconventional sonic resources, particularly those derived from string instruments. He used many of the same techniques, and others, in the more transparent quarter medium. The result was one of the most novel formulations of string quartet sound. In addition to a full array of more or less established playing techniques ­ arco, sul ponticello, col legno, pizzicato, and glissando ­ the score calls for playing between the bridge and tailpiece; bowing the tailpiece itself; striking both the strings and the body of the instrument with the wood portion of the bow or with the hand; different speeds of vibrato, as well as non-vibrato playing; and rapid, uneven tremolo. Penderecki uses all these devices in kaleidoscopic succession during the initial section of the piece, where loosely coordinated bursts of sound from the four instruments create a pointillist texture of tremendous vitality. This extraordinary barrage eventually gives way to its antithesis; sustained sonorities ­ alternately motionless or shimmering with different types of vibrato and tremolo ­ forming flat, monochromatic aural fabrics. The juxtaposition of these two very distinct types of music establishes a riveting dialectic during the final pages of the piece, with statis and quiet having the last word.
The piece was premiered by the La Salle Quartet in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Sonata No. 2 for Violin and Piano
The composition was commissioned by Annie-Sophie Mutter and is dedicated to her. It is a large-scale work in five symmetrically arranged movements. A central Nocturne is contained within two fast movements, effectively scherzos, and the whole is framed by two comparatively brief slower movements.
The violin1s opening monologue states the semitone-dominated material which will be freely transformed throughout the sonata. Characteristically, this accumulates towards an explosive climax. The first scherzo follows without a break. Its basic spiky character shades into animation, agitation and caprice, but is always held in check by its basis in a clear G minor.
The lengthy Nocturne is rooted in a darkly chromatic C minor. Both instruments spin out increasingly elaborate figuration, until the piano emerges with a nervy, continuously accelerating waltz. A brutal, arriving scherzo follows, fixated on the repeated Ds heard at the opening. Like the first movement this eventually boils over into a violent gestural climax. Trilled Ds on the violin link into the final movement, which begins as a reminiscence of the opening Larghetto, but moves into a free recall of the Nocturne and, at the end, of its C minor tonality.
David Fanning

String Quartet No. 2
It can be said that this quartet picks up where the first left off. After an initial loud chord, we hear the sort of sustained sonorities similar to those at the close of the First Quartet. Here, too, Penderecki is intent on exploring new types of string sonority. He leaves behind, however, the percussive sounds that were so prominent in the First String Quartet, delving instead into novel effects produced by the conjunction of bow and string. These include an essentially melodic use of vibrato and glissando, lines entailing precisely indicated quarter-tones and rapidly flowing scorrevole (in a flowing style), yielding a flickering texture of high-speed counterpoint. Characteristic of the work1s aural atmosphere is an ethereal sound produced by harmonics played against sustained tones whistled by the four players. In this piece, too, Penderecki shapes the form in a masterful way, basing it on a simple succession of three parts: slow­fast­slow. The work dies away with a glissando as the cellist turning the tuning peg of his lowest string, slowly lowering the pitch.
String Quartet No. 2 was premiered by the Parrenin Quartet in Berlin in 1970.

Sextet for Piano, Violin, Viola, Cello, Clarinet and Horn
Chamber music plays an ever-expanding part in Krzysztof Pende-recki1s oeuvre of the last decade. The composer himself described this phenomenon in 1993: OToday, having gone through the post-Romantic lesson, and having exhausted the potential of postmodern thinking, I see my artistic ideal in claritas. I turn to chamber music in the belief that more can be said softly, condensed into the tone of three or four instruments. This escape into musical privacy might be an answer of sorts to our own fin de si…cle, to the acceleration of history and to the turmoil of overturned norms of culture, ethics, and politics1. Penderecki described his Clarinet Quartet written at the time as Oa meeting of four close friends, all of whom have something to say. But, since they know each other so well, nothing has to be said too plainly1.
The same attitude to chamber music is manifest in Penderecki1s Sextet for Piano, Violin, Viola, Cello, Clarinet and Horn. He clearly relates to the great tradition of joyful shared music-making in the chamber music of Mozart, Schubert, or Brahms.
Penderecki1s poetic universe of musical narration is dominated by
a dialogue between personae represented by the individual instruments. They either speak in a single voice or present differing points of view. In their conversations, discussions, arguments, or bantering, they present musical ideas and characters, motives and themes in an often masterly use of the counterpoint in varied types of instrumental textures. The internal integration of the musical material creates the image of a single field for this musical game. At the same time, the clear and condensed form of the piece drives home the pure beauty of artistic order.
The music of the Sextet is characteristic in its restraint of means employed, in its rhythmical expressiveness, in the lightness, lucidity, and sophistication of its counterpointed system of the individual instruments; also, in its clear form and variety of expression. It offers the twinkling humour of scherzo themes and jesting, ironic, or even grotesque, allusions to characteristic dance rhythms, through multi-hued lyricism of concealed emotion to a nostalgic concentration on the inner world of a person conscious of his or her transience.
Krzysztof Penderecki1s Sextet consists of two movements: Allegro moderato and Larghetto.
The dynamic Allegro moderato is maintained in vigorous and expressive time, with frequent asymmetric rhythm structures (a prevalence of the staccato). It begins with an accented and rest-separated repetition of a flat in the piano1s bass, which sets the centre of reference of the movement. Returns and pitch shifts of this motive (with different rhythm models) establish the general Otonal1 plan of this section
(a flat, d, f, d, a flat, d). This approach also returns in the repetition of accented chords, imparting on the narration a joyful dancing aura, and no wonder: note repetitions as a significant musical gesture (in its various functions) are part of the composer1s basic repertoire of musical language means. The primary theme ­ of a misleading simplicity and a jocular, somewhat capricious character ­ is introduced by the clarinet and contains motives from which other musical ideas of the first movement will derive. At bars 157-8, a lyrical-declamatory melodic phrase will appear in punctuated rhythm to anticipate the main theme of the second movement.
The extensive Larghetto contrasts in time and character with its predecessor and is the main part of the Sextet. Its singular and solemn theme, declamatory and expressive, is based on a falling sequence of minor seconds enhanced with a repetitive iambic rhythm pattern. It is presented in various instruments and undergoes refined development and transformation. Of particular note is the original part of the piano, different from its usual emploi. Repeated notes or dominating single-voice (or octave) recitative parts and figures of motion come side-by-side with segments set on several planes. Towards the end,
a peculiar retrospection applies a different metaphysical perspective; dematerialised, echoing motives of nostalgia vanish into silence.
The premiere of the Sextet took place at Vienna1s Musikverein on
6 June 2000. It was performed by Dmitri Alexeev (piano), Julian Rachlin (violin), Yuri Bashmet (viola), Mstislav Rostropovich (cello), Paul Meyer (clarinet), and Radovan Vlatkovic (horn).
Regina Ch1opicka